SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 146

SUBHASH KAKADE
Jamuna Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Asha – Respondent


Advocates:
Vineet Kumar Pandey for applicant.

ORDER

1. This revision under section 397/401 of CrPC has been filed by the applicant against the order dated 21.1.2015 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Katni in Miscellaneous Case No.519/2014. The applicant/husband has been ordered to pay Rs.3000/- as maintenance amount to respondent/wife per month.

2. The respondent-wife filed an application under section 125 of CrPC for grant of maintenance. It is contended by her that she was ill treated for demand of dowry, she was unable to maintain herself, therefore, she may be granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month.

The applicant-husband entered by filing reply before learned Family Court contended that the respondent was never ill treated for demand of dowry. She is living in the house of applicant and earning Rs.200/- per day by doing stitching work. In addition the applicant also fulfils the necessary requirement of respondent for livelihood. He prays for rejection of the application on the ground that he is working as a labourer.

3. Learned Family Court has granted maintenance at the rate of Rs.2,000/- per month to the respondent-wife from 3rd November, 2011 to December, 2014 and thereafter from January, 2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top