SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 177

SUBHASH KAKADE
Ramvati – Appellant
Versus
Sadhana – Respondent


Advocates:
Kamlesh Sharma for applicants; Chandrapal Singh Parmar for respondent No.1; D. K. Paroha, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.2/State.

ORDER

1. This petition under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, hereinafter referred to as 'the Code' has been filed by the applicant for quashing of order dated 28.8.2015, passed in Criminal Appeal No.315/2013, by learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Chhindwara, whereby the application under section 320(2), CrPC filed by the parties has been rejected by holding that as the applicants have been convicted under section 498A of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for 03 years and fine of Rs.500/- each vide judgment dated 5.9.2013 delivered in Criminal Case No.1715/2004, therefore, the permission to compound the aforesaid offence could not be granted.

2. The respondent No.1 had filed a complaint before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chhindwara registered as Criminal Complaint Case No.1715/2004. After recording of the evidence, learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chhindwara has convicted the applicants under section 498A/34 of IPC vide judgment dated 5.9.2013 and sentenced to R.I. for 3 years and fine of Rs.500/- each. The applicants being aggrieved by the conviction and sentence filed an appeal under section 374 of CrPC before the learned Sessions Judge, Chhindwara which is pe








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top