ROHIT ARYA
Sapna Saxena – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of Smt. Sapna Saxena appointed as Aanganwadi Worker, Village Karvas, Tahsil Gohad, District Bhind upon selection, challenging the order passed by the Collector dated 12.5.2016 (Annexure P-1) allowing application dated 15.10.2015 (Annexure P-8) filed by the respondent No.4, Ms.Sunita Upadhyay to be arrayed as party under Order I rule 10 CPC in an appeal filed by the respondent No.5, Mata Prasad on 20.7.2012 questioning her appointment order dated 12.6.2012 (Annexure P-2).
2. Facts necessary and relevant for disposal of this writ petition are to the effect that the State Government has framed a policy for the purpose of selection and appointment of Aanganwadi Worker/Assistant. The amended policy dated 10.7.2007 (Annexure R/4-1) is on record which inter alia provides for an appeal under clause C-6 and the same reads as under:
^^l&6%&vihy vk¡xuokM+h dk;ZdrkZ@lgkf;dk dh fu;qfDr@lsok ls i`Fkd~ djus ds fdlh Hkh izdj.k esa fookn gksus dh fLFkfr esa vkosfndk }kjk vafre lwph izdk'ku ds fnukad ls 10 fnol ds Hkhrj dyDVj ds le{k vihy dh tk ldsxhA dyDVj }kjk 15 fnol ds Hkhrj vihy dk fujkdj.k fd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.