SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 654

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
R. S. Jha and C. V. Sirpurkar, JJ.
Kazi Mohammad Hanif v. State of M.P. and others
Writ Petition No.560 of 2008 (Jabalpur); against order dated 10.4.2007 passed by Collector, Jabalpur in Revenue
Case No.4/A-59/2006-07; Decided on 25.11.2016.

Advocates:
A.T. Faridee for petitioner;
Deepak Awasthi, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

Headnote: ¼1½ oDQ vf/kfu;e] 1954 & /kkjk 4] 5 rFkk 6 & e-iz- Hkw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 & /kkjk 237 & fuLrkj i=d esa Hkwfe dfczLrku] dwM+k djdV dk <sj djus vkSj [kkn ds xM~<ksa ds fy, vkjf{kr & fofgr izfØ;k dk ikyu djus ds i'pkr~ & 0-995 gSDVj Hkwfe esa ls 0-050 gSDVj eqfLye lekt ds leqnk; Hkou ds fy, vkcafVr dh xbZ & D;k dfczLrku iz;kstu ds fy, nh xbZ Hkwfe oDQ laifÙk gS & izdj.k ;g ugha gS fd oDQ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 4] 5 rFkk 6 ds v/khu fofgr izfØ;k viukbZ xbZ & ;kph ;g vkèkkj ugha ys ldrk fd iz'uxr Hkwfe oDQ laifÙk gS vkSj lafgrk dh /kkjk 237 ds v/khu vU; vlaØkE; gSA , vkb vkj 2000 ,l lh 402 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 6½

       ¼2½ Hkw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 ¼e-iz-½ & /kkjk 237 rFkk 234 & Hkwfe ds mi;ksx esa ifjorZu & dc iz'uxr ugha fd;k tk ldrk & fuLrkj i=d esa & Hkwfe fofo/k iz;kstuksa ds fy, vkjf{kr & vFkkZr~ dfczLrku] dwM+k djdV <sj rFkk [kkn ds xM~<ksa ds fy, & fofgr izfØ;k dk ikyu djus vkSj vkifÙk;ksa ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr~ & vkjf{kr Hkwfe ds {ks= 0-995 gSDVj esa ls & 0-050 gSDVj Hkwfe eqfLye lekt dks leqnk; Hkou ds fy, vkcafVr & fjV vf/kdkfjrk esa gLr{ksi visf{kr ugha & ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh xbZA ¼iSjk 8 ls 10½

       (1) Wakf Act, 1954 -- Ss.4, 5 and 6 -- M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 -- S.237 -- land reserved in Nistar Patrak for graveyard, dumping rubbish and manure -- after following prescribed procedure -- 0.050 hectare land out of 0.995 hectare of land allotted to Muslim Community for community building -- whether land dedicated for purpose of graveyard is wakf property -- it is not the case that procedure prescribed under sections 4, 5 and 6 of Wakf Act was adopted -- petitioner cannot take ground that land in question is wakf property and is inalienable under section 237 of Code. AIR 2002 SC 402 referred to. [Paras 6

       (2) Land Revenue Code, 1959 (M.P.) -- Ss.237 and 234 -- change user of land -- when cannot be questioned -- in Nistar Patrak -- land reserved for composite purposes -- i.e. for graveyard, dumping rubbish and manure -- after following prescribed procedure and considering objections -- out of reserved area 0.995 hectare of land -- 0.050 hectare of land allotted to Muslim Community for community building -- no interference called for in writ jurisdiction -- petition dismissed.

        [Paras 8 to 10

ORDER

1. This writ petition is directed against order 10.4.2007 passed by Collector, Jabalpur in Revenue Case No.4/A-59/2006-07 whereby land user head of 0.050 hectares of land comprised in Survey No.125/3 of Village Katangi, Tahsil Patan, District Jabalpur, was directed to be changed from that of graveyard and for dumping ground for rubbish and manure to that of Abadi for the purpose of Community building.

2. The facts giving rise to this writ petition may be summarized as hereunder: Some members of Muslim community made a representation to the authorities for construction of community building in Ward No.8 of Nagar Panchayat, Katangi. Pursuant to aforesaid demand, the Nagar Panchayat Katangi in its Meeting No.18 dated 15.3.2007, passed a resolution for allotment of suitable land by Sub-Divisional Officer for aforesaid purpose and also accorded financial and administrative sanction of Rs.7,00,000/- for construction of community building. Survey No.125/3 of Patwari Halka No.1, Revenue Circle Katangi, Tahsil, Patan was reserved in the Nistar Patrak for the composite purpose of graveyard and for dumping rubbish and manure; however, it was not shown in the Revenue records as to which specific part of the land was reserved for which of the aforesaid two specific purposes. The Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Patan in Case No.2-A and 3A-59/06-07 vide order dated 7.4.2007 published advertisement inviting objections for changing the land user head of Survey No.125/3 in the Newspaper and after considering the objections so received and after considering Spot Inspection Report and Report of Patwari recorded a finding to the effect that the land situated in the north-east side of the tamarind tree was earmarked for the purpose of dumping rubbish and manure and remaining land was reserved for the purpose of grave-yard. The SDO recommended that 0.40 of hectare of land reserved for dumping of rubbish and manure can be allotted to the Nagar Panchayat, Katangi for the purpose of community building by changing the land user head. Consequently the Collector, by impugned order dated 10.4.2007, directed that 0.050 hectare of land comprised in Survey No.125/3 be separated from the remaining land in the Nistar Patrak and be allotted for the purpose of construction of community building.

3. The petitioner, claiming to be a resident of Katangi, filed this writ petition challenging order dated 10.4.2007 on the ground that in the Nistar Patrak, Survey No.125/3 has been reserved for the purpose of graveyard, wherein the Muslims have been burying their dead since time immemorial and continue to do so. A land once dedicated to graveyard becomes wakf property and becomes inalienable; therefore, its land user head cannot be changed in exercise of power under section 237 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code (Herein after referred to in this order as "the Code"). The land for community building could have been allotted from Survey No.125/1 and 125/2 which is government land. The members of Muslim Community raised several objections against the conversion of land user head; however, those objections were not considered and decided. No demarcation was made in order to ascertain as to which specific part of the land comprised in Survey No.125/3, was earmarked for which specific purpose.

4. The respondents No.1 to 3 have opposed the writ petition submitting that the land for the purpose of community building was allotted on the demand of members of Muslim community. The Survey No.125/3 admeasuring 0.995 hectares was never reserved exclusively for the purpose of graveyard. It was earmarked in the Nistar Patrak for the composite purpose of graveyard as well as dumping refuse and manure; thus, entire area never became wakf property. On the representation made by public at large, the revenue authority, after following due procedure, inviting objections by publication of notice in the newspapers and after considering objections, identified the part of the land that was never












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top