VIVEK RUSIA
Kirti Bugde – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. Petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order of termination dated 20.4.2015.
2. Facts of the case are as under. That respondents No.2, 3 and 4 Dashpur Vidyalaya invited applications for appointment of Teacher in the year 2008. The petitioner being qualified for the post of Teacher applied and was called for interview on 14.7.2008. After undergoing regular selection process petitioner was appointed as Teacher w.e.f. 15.7.2008 and she was offered salary of Rs.3,500/- per month with 12% deduction of provident fund. The appointment order was temporary up to 30.4.2009 and liable to be terminated without notice at any stage when the work is not found satisfactory. In pursuant to the appointment order petitioner joined and started work as Teacher and the appointment order was continued from time to time. Appreciation letter was issued to the petitioner. Apart from teaching petitioner was directed to perform other duties like publication of school magazine etc. While performing the duties petitioner has pursued M.Sc. Degree in Chemistry. All of a sudden she was called by the Principal and handed over termination order on 20.4.2015 and asked not to go to her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.