SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 642

ROHIT ARYA
Rajendra Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Arun Katare for petitioner;
Smt. Ami Prabal, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

1.This writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India by a Deputy Commandant (Additional Superintendent of Police), II Battalion, SAF is directed against rejection of the grant for selection grade as on 1.1.2010 by the DPC convened on 29.11.2013 communicated to the petitioner, on 15.9.2016 under the Right to Information Act.

2. Facts shorn of necessary details are to the effect that for grant of selection grade on the post of Additional Superintendent of Police,the criteria is fixed in the circular issued by the Home Department, State of Madhya Pradesh No.1(B)124/13/B-4/Do for the DPC proceedings and the bench mark is ‘13’. The relevant part in paragraph 6 (1) and (3) are reproduced below:-

^^¼6½ izoj Js.kh osrueku Lohd`r fd, tkus gsrq Nkuchu lfefr }kjk fuEukuqlkj ekinaM viuk, x, %&

1- ik¡p o"kksZ ds xksiuh; izfrosnuksa esa dksbZ xaHkhj izfrdwy Vhdk vafdr u gks rFkk fdlh Hkh o"kZ esa ^^?k** Js.kh ugha gksuk pkfg,A

2- -------------

3- fiNys ik¡p o"kksZ ds xksiuh; izfrosnuksa ds ewY;kadu ds fy, Js.kh ^^d** dks 04 ^^d** dks 03 vad] **[k** dks 02] ^^x** dks 01






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top