Back
ANAND PATHAK
Mulayam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Heard with consent.
1. The present petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the petitioner-accused invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court whereby the petitioner is seeking direction to the trial Court for conducting DNA test of the present petitioner-accused who is facing the charge of section 376 of IPC before the trial Court. He is further aggrieved by the order dated 22.5.2015 whereby the application preferred by the present petitioner for DNA test of himself has been rejected on the ground that the case has not been committed before the competent Court. He is further aggrieved by the order dated 13.10.2015 whereby the Sessions Court (after committal of case to the Sessions Court) has also rejected the application.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is facing charge of section 376 of IPC before the Sessions Court, Mungaoli District Ashoknagar in respect of alleged incident taken place on 17.3.2015 wherein according to prosecution, petitioner-accused has committed rape over the prosecutrix. According to him, he is innocent and has been framed by the prosecutrix/complainant with the help of pr
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
