IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Alok Verma, J.
Jyoti Hardia (Smt.) and another v. Anant Haritwal and another
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.8707 of 2016 (Indore) : against the order dated 11.8.2016, passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class Sanwer, District Indore in an unregistered case; Decided on 29.9.2016.
Held : However, no status report was called by the Magistrate in compliance of directions issued by this Court.... This apart, the application under section 156(3) CrPC was filed for registration of offence under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 120B of IPC and section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Nos.3, 4 and 5 are public servant. The Magistrate did not apply his mind as to whether he had jurisdiction in view of the fact that the applicants also allege an offence under Prevention of Corruption Act, where jurisdiction to take cognizance is given to Special Court constituted under the Act. (2015)6 SCC 278 followed. ILR (2014) MP 1404 relied on. 2004(2) JLJ 234, (1996)1 SCC 542, (2003)11 SCC 251, (2008)12 SCC 346, (2009)13 SCC 443, (2006)1 SCC 627, 1992 Supp.(1) SCC 335 and AIR 1960 SC 866 referred to.
naM izfdz;k lafgrk] 1973 & /kkjk 156¼3½ rFkk 482 & naM lafgrk] 1860 & /kkjk 420] 406] 467] 468 rFkk 120[k & Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e] 1988 & /kkjk 13¼1½¼?k½ & vkosnd ds fo:} izFke bfryk fjiksVZ jftLVMZ djus ds fy, funs'k & ftlds fo:} iqujh{k.k iks"k.kh; u gksus ls [kkfjt & HkkŒnaŒlaŒ rFkk vf/kfu;e] 1988 ds v/khu vijk/k ds jftLVªhdj.k ds fy, vkosnu izLrqr & dksbZ izkfLFkfr fjiksVZ ugha cqykbZ xbZ & eftLVªsV us mica/kksa ds v/khu D;k mls {ks=kf/kdkj Fkk bl laca/k esa vius euksfu;ksx dk iz;ksx ugha fd;k & tc laKku ysus dk {ks=kf/kdkj fo'ks"k U;k;ky; dks fn;k x;k & vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr & ekeyk u;s fljs ls vkosnu fujkd`r djus ds fy, eftLVsªV U;k;ky; dks izR;kofrZr fd;k x;k & vkosnu funs'kksa ds lkFk fujkd`rA vfHkfu/kkZfjr % fQj Hkh bl U;k;ky; }kjk tkjh funs'kksa ds ikyu esa eftLVsªV us dksbZ izkfLFkfr fjiksVZ ugha cqykbZA blds vfrfjDr] HkkŒnaŒlaŒ dh /kkjk 420] 406] 467] 468] 120[k ds v/khu vijk/k ds jftLVªhdj.k ds fy, naM izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 156¼3½ rFkk Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13¼1½¼?k½ ds v/khu vkosnu izLrqr fd;k x;kA vfHk;qDr dz- 3] 4 ,oa 5 yksd lsod gS eftLVsªV us bl laca/k esa fd vkonsdx.k us Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e ds v/khu vijk/k Hkh vfHkdfFkr fd;k gS] D;k og {ks=kf/kdkj j[krk Fkk vius euksfu;ksx dk mi;ksx ugha fd;k gS tgk¡ laKku ysus ds fy, {ks=kf/kdkj vf/kfu;e ds v/khu xfBr fo'ks"k U;k;ky; dks fn;k x;k gSA ¼2015½ 6 ,l lh lh 278 vuqlfjrA vkb ,y vkj ¼2014½ ,e ih 1404 voyafcrA 2004 ¼2½ ts ,y ts 234] ¼1996½ 1 ,l lh lh 542] ¼2003½ 11 ,l lh lh 251] ¼2008½ 12 ,l lh lh 346] ¼2009½ 13 ,l lh lh 443] ¼2006½ 1 ,l lh lh 627] 1992 lIyh-¼1½ ,l lh lh 335 rFkk , vkb vkj 1960 ,l lh 866 fufnZ"VA
1. This application filed under section 482 CrPC is preferred against the order dated 11-8-2016 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sanwer, District Indore in an unregistered criminal case under section 156(3) CrPC, whereby the learned Magistrate allowed the application filed by respondent No.1 under the aforesaid provisions of law and directed registration of FIR against the applicants.
2. The application reveals that applicant No.1 is the owner of land bearing survey No.308/1 situated at village Arjun Baroda, Tahsil Sanwer, District Indore. She purchased this land from one Shravan Verma, who in his turn purchased the land from one Dhulji after obtaining permission under section 165(6) of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959. A diversion order was issued in respect of this land on 1.6.2010 by Sub-Divisional Officer.
3. Applicant No.2 which is a society and is run by Dr. Ajay Hardia (husband of applicant No.1) owns the land bearing survey No.305/3 situated at village Arjun Baroda, Tahsil Sanwer, District Indore, which was purchased from one Jagadish Mantri, who purchased the land from one Jagannath after obtaining permission under section 165(6) of M.P. Land Revenue Code, as Jagannath was said to be the member of Scheduled Tribes. The sale deed and copies of various orders passed by authorities are placed at Annexures P-1 to P-5.
4. The layout plan was sanctioned by Joint Director Town and Country Planning, Indore on 3.8.2010. Copy of sanctioned layout plan is placed at Annexure P-6.
5. Respondent No.2 constructed building of land bearing survey No.308/1 situated at Arjun Baroda. According to layout plan sanctioned by Town and Country Planning, Indore, applicant No.2 was running a Dental College and Hospital in the name and style of ‘Devi Ahilya College and Hospital’. The land bearing survey No.305/3 is lying vacant.
6. According to applicants, one society namely “Hare Rama Hare Krishna Sikshan Samiti” runs an institute of Paramedical Science in the name and style of ‘Kewalshri Institute of Paramedical Science’. Most of the members viz. Vivek Hardia, Jaya Hardia, of the society namely Hare Rama Hare Krishna Sikshan Samiti, were close relatives of Mahendra Hardia - the Ex-Deputy Health Minister and Medical Education Minister, Government of M.P. and Ex-Chairman of M.P. Paramedical Council, Bhopal. The said Mahendra Hardia sold a land bearing survey No.5/1/2 area measuring 0.654 hectare situated at Patwari Halka No.27, Village Shiv Nagar, Tahsil Mhow, District Indore. Respondent No.1, who in his turn executed an unregistered lease deed in favour of the said society showing that a building constructed on the land. However, no building exists on this land. Copy of sale deed and lease deed is placed at Annexures P-7 and P-8. According to applicants, in order to obtain permission for running an institute for Paramedical Science, fraudulently, building belonging to applicant No.2 society of survey No.308/1 village Arjun Baroda was shown to the inspection team of M.P. Paramedical Council on 18.8.2011. This report is marked as Annexure P-8. Based on aforesaid inspection report, the permission was granted to the society.
7. Respondent No.1 obtained various papers under the provisions of Right to Information Act and filed a criminal complaint on 3.2.2016 before the JMFC, Sanwer against the accused persons along with society. The said complaint was also accompanied by an application under section 156(3) CrPC. The Judicial Magistrate allowed the application filed under section 156(3) CrPC and directed the concerning police station to register an FIR against the accused persons.
8. Aggrieved by this order, the accused persons and also the Station House Officer of Police Station Kshipra filed a revision before 17th Additional Sessions Judge, Indore. The revision was dismissed, and thereafter, an application under section 482 CrPC was filed before this Court which was registered as Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.2241/2016. By order dated
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.