SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 160

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Yadav, J.
D.K. Construction - Petitioner
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 15900 of 2011
Decided on : 06-02-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Priyankush Jain, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent:Shri A.P. Singh, Govt. Advocate

The contents of an instrument are relevant for stamp duty, and clear empowerment to receive consideration attracts stamp duty as a conveyance.

Headnote:

Stamp Duty - General Power of Attorney - Stamp Act, 1899, M.P. Prakoshtha Swamitva Adhiniyam, 1976 - Article 48-B, Article 48(f-1), Article 23, Section 3 of M.P. 1997 Act, Section 3 of M.P. 2002 Act - [Summary of Acts and Sections]

Fact of the Case:

The court considered whether a General Power of Attorney executed for land transfer attracts stamp duty applicable to conveyance.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Power of Attorney empowered the agent to enter into an agreement of sale and receive the sale consideration, thus attracting stamp duty as a conveyance.

Issues: The issues involved the interpretation of the General Power of Attorney and the relevant stamp duty provisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the contents of the instrument, not the form, are relevant for stamp duty. It also emphasized the clear empowerment of the agent to receive consideration.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, affirming the imposition of stamp duty on the General Power of Attorney.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay Yadav, J.

1. Shri Priyankush Jain, learned counsel for petitioner.

Shri A.P. Singh, Govt. Advocate for respondents-State of M.P. and its functionaries.

With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard.

Issue which arises for consideration is whether the Authority viz. Collector of Stamp and the Appellate Authority viz. Board of Revenue are justified in holding that the General Power of Attorney executed by respondents No.3 and 4 in favour of petitioner in respect of land bearing Khasra No.63/5/1/3, 63/5/2, 63/5/1/1, 63/5/1/2, 63/4/1 comprising 1.98 acres and Khasra No.66/1/3 comprising 0.12 acre, aggregating 2.10 acres, situated at Village Chuna Bhatti, Tahsil Huzur District Bhopal, contains element of transfer attracting stamp duty applicable to conveyance.

2. The General Power of Attorney in question which was executed and registered on 15.3.2002 besides being irrevocable (Clause 16 stipulates that "this Power of Attorney shall be irrevocable and we shall not revoke it in any manner whatsoever and if we do any act contrary to this power of attorney the same shall be null and void and ineffective against us"), also contained Clause 8, which is in the following terms :

"8. To enter into agreement of sale/booking of the portions of the share of M/s D.K. Constructions in terms of agreement of the said project and/or shops/offices to be constructed with prospective purchasers and to receive the sale consideration in part or in full in his name and to execute and sign on its behalf the necessary agreement of sale and the conveyance deed in favour of the purchaser subject to the provisions of M.P. Prakoshtha Swamitva Adhiniyam, 1976 and to present the same for registration propose in the office of Sub-Registrar, Bhopal and to admit and acknowledge the execution of the same and receipt of sale consideration as having been received by the firm, D.K. Construction."

3. Being trite it is that it is the contents/recitals and not the form of an instrument which is relevant to attract the stamp duty (Please see : Omprakash v. Laxminarayan (2014) 1 SCC 618 wherein it is held that "if in a document certain recitals are made then the Court would decide the admissibility of the document on the strength of such recitals and not otherwise"), the Collector of Stamp in purported exercise of the power under Article 48-B of the Stamp Act, 1899, initiated an action for imposition of duty in consonance with Article 48(f-1) of Schedule 1-A and passed the following order : -

esjs }kjk lcaf/kar eq[R;kjukek ns[kk x;kA bl nLrkost ds i`"B 2 dh df.Mdk 8 esa ;g fy[kk gS fd eq[R;kjxzghrk lacaf/kr laifRr ds fodz; /kujkf'k dks Lo;a ds uke ij ys ldsxkA vraj.k foys[k fu"ikfnr dj ldsxkA blh nLrkost ds i`"B dzekad 3 dh df.Mdk 16 esa ;g eq[R;kjukek vfujLr.kh; gksxk] vafdr gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa u dsoy ;g izfrQy dh ,ot esa fy[kk x;k gS] cfYd fcdzh ds vfujLr.kh; vf/kdkj fn;s tkus ls ;g vuqlwph 1(d) ds vuqPNns 48 (p&1) ds varxZr liafRr ds cktkj ewY; ij varj.k i= dh Hkkafr LVkfEir gksuk pkfg, FkkA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl ij xzke pwukHkV~Vh ds dqy 1-87 ,dM+ Hkwfe ds ewY; ds cjkcj ewY; ij lk<+s lkr izfr'kr dh nj ls LVkEi 'kqYd ns; gksxkA xkbZM ykbu o"kZ 2001&02 ds vuqlkj Hkwfe dh dher 73]86]500 #i;s ij 5]53]987 #i;s LVkEi 'kqYd esa ls iwoZ iznRr 100 #i;s LVkEi 'kqYd de dj 'ks"k 5]53]887 :i;s (ikap yk[k frjiu gtkj vkB lkS lRrklh ek=) LVkEi 'kqYd ns; gksxkA vukosnd lalwfpr gks rFkk vkns'k dh izfr vkosnd mi iath;d dks Hksth tk;sA jkf'k tek u fd;s tkus ij 30 fnu ckn cdk;k olwyh dk ekeyk ntZ gksA

4. Petitioner challenged the order before the Board of Revenue, which affirmed the order passed by Collector of Stamp, by its order-dated 28.4.2010 which is being challenged vide this petition.

5. It is contended that the Revenue Authority i.e. Collector of Stamp did not afford an opportunity of hearing. The contentions are belied from the findings in paragraph 7.1 of the Board of Revenue that :

"dysDVj vkWQ LVkEi dh vkns'kif=vksa ls Li"V gS fd dysDVj vkWQ LVk





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top