S.K.GANGELE, SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Mintu Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through SP, CBI Jabalpur – Respondent
Subodh Abhyankar, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved of the judgment dated 6/11/2012 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, CBI, Jabalpur in Special Case No.12/2010, whereby the present appellant has been convicted along with other accused R.C.Mishra and is sentenced as under:
Conviction u/s Sentence Default clause
7 of Prevention of Corruption Act RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.10,000/- RI for three months
13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.1,000/- RI for one month
120-B of IPC RI for 2 years with fine of Rs.500/- RI for one month
2. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that on 21.4.2009 a complaint was filed by the complainant Rakesh Kumar Tiwari (PW-6) before the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short CBI), Jabalpur wherein it was alleged that he is an authorised officer of M/s Rohit Coal Depot, which is registered with Northern Coal-fields Limited (NCL) to participate in the coal auction and in one such auction they had purchased 1000 metric tons of coal. It is further stated by the complainant that the coal, which
Assoo v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Banarsi Dass v. State of Haryana
P. Satyanarayana Murthy v. District Inspector of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.