S.C.SHARMA
Santosh Bharti – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
S.C. Sharma, J.
The petitioner before this Court is aggrieved by an order passed by the competent Disciplinary Authority dated 04/04/2014 by which a major punishment of compulsory retirement has been inflicted upon the petitioner. The petitioner is also aggrieved by order dated 03/12/2014 passed in appeal by Director General of Police.
2. The facts of the case reveal that the petitioner at the relevant point of time was posted as Inspector in Reserve Scheme, Dhar (Police) and it is alleged that he was unauthorisedly absent from the duty on 14/09/2012. It is also alleged that on 03/10/2012 at Indore, he took an auto rickshaw and purchased a bottle of liquor. It is further alleged that after consuming liquor, he assaulted the auto driver and misbehaved in public.
3. On the basis of the aforesaid incident, the petitioner was placed under suspension by an order dated 04/10/2012. A Preliminary Enquiry took place in the matter and in the Preliminary Enquiry, the petitioner was not associated in any manner. It was conducted behind the back of the petitioner. Shri Vikram Singh, City Superintendent of Police, Pithampur, Distt. Dhar submitted a preliminary enquiry report. It has been arg
Central Bank of India Ltd. v. Prakash Chand Jain
K.L. Tripathi v. State of Bank of India
Krushnakant B. Parmar v. Union of India
Kuldeep Singh v. Commissioner of Police
Sawai Singh v. State of Rajasthan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.