SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 800

VIVEK RUSIA
Rosan Nargave – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Shri Manoj Manav, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Shri Yogesh Mittal, G.A.

ORDER :

Vivek Rusia, J.

With the consent of parties, petition is heard finally.

Petitioner No.1 who is the Secretary of Gram Panchayat, Dhamnai and petitioner No.2 who is the Ex-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Bomya approached this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 8.10.2015 passed by S.D.O (Revenue), the Prescribed Authority, Badwani by which petitioners have been directed to deposit the amount of Rs.3.79 lacs within thirty days. The aforesaid order was passed under section 92 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Panchayat Act').

2. That it has been alleged against the petitioners that during their tenure the work of construction of toilets were awarded to the Panchayat and during this tenure while working as Sarpanch and Secretary they did not construct 100 toilets for which an amount of Rs.4,60,000/- was sanctioned. It is alleged that while working as Sarpanch and Secretary they withdrew an amount of Rs.3.79 lacs. They were required to be utilized for constructing 82 toilets at the rate of Rs.4600/- which they did not construct. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat has constituted an inspection committee whic
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top