SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 805

R.S.JHA, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Vineeta Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Radheyshyam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned Counsel.

JUDGMENT :

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.

This appeal is filed by the wife/appellant under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter shall be referred as 'the Act' in short) against the judgment and decree dated 22/09/2016 passed by the Additional District Judge, Multai District Betul (M.P.) whereby the marriage between the appellant and respondent/husband has been dissolved on the ground of mental cruelty and desertion. The decree of divorce has been granted in favour of the respondent/husband. The court below has further directed that the respondent/husband will pay maintenance of Rs. 4000/- per month from the date of decree till the appellant enters into re-marriage. The court below has directed that the child of the appellant and respondent namely Abhinav shall stay with his father who will provide him the best education and facilities. It has also been directed by the trial Court that the appellant will be at liberty to meet her son at any time without there being any restriction in this regard.

2. The relevant fact soft he case in brief are that the respondent/husband filed a petition under section 13 (1) of the Act on the ground of mental cruelty and desertion on the part of hi


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top