S.C. Sharma, J.

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, the writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of the Writ Petition No.8822/2013 are narrated hereunder.

2. The petitioner before this Court, M.P. Road Transport Corporation and others have filed this present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 26.02.2013 pronounced on 01.04.2013, passed in case No.72/08-ID/Reference, by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ujjain.

3. Facts of the case reveal that the petitioner No.1 is corporation constituted under the provisions of Road Transport Corporation Act, 1958 and the respondent No.1 is a trade union registered under the Trade Union Act.

4. As the corporation was facing financial crunch, a scheme was framed in the year 2000 known as Voluntary Retirement Scheme and scheme was finally introduced in the year 2004 known as VRS scheme 2004. It has been stated in the writ petition that based upon the VRS scheme, options were invited from the employees and employees with open eyes accepted the scheme of VRS and the dues were paid to them while granting retirement to t