Back
P.K.JAISWAL, VIRENDER SINGH
Central Board of Trustees, Employee's Provident Fund Organization, Indore – Appellant
Versus
Force Motors Limited, Pithampur, District-Dhar – Respondent
Virender Singh, J.
The petitioner, who is Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (for short APFC) on behalf of Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization has challenged the order dated 26.07.2016 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short EPFAT) in ATA No. 1212(8) of 2015, whereby learned EPFAT has allowed the appeal filed by the respondent and set aside the order passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner directing the Respondent to deposit contribution of provident fund of 1223 employees working in the respondent establishment taking them as regular employees of the respondent establishment.
2. Relevant facts giving rise to the present petition; in brief are that to secure compliance of the provisions of the EPF Act, an inspection was carried out in the Respondent establishment on 06.01.2012 and 22.01.2012. It was found that total 2926 employees were working in the Respondent establishment; out of which, as shown by the Respondent, 1753 employees were employed directly, 150 employees were employed through contractor and 1223 were appointed as trainee technicians. It was further found that in fact these 1223 em
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
