SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 869

C.V.SIRPURKAR
Anand Chaturvedi – Appellant
Versus
I. S. Mourya – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate.

ORDER :

Shri C.V. Sirpurkar, J.

1. This miscellaneous criminal case under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C. for special leave to appeal against acquittal is directed against the judgment dated 31.07.2012 passed by the Court of JMFC (Fast Track Court), Bhopal in criminal case No.10303/2010, whereby respondent-accused I.S. Mourya was acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881.

2. The facts necessary for disposal of this miscellaneous criminal case may briefly best a ted thus : applicant/complainant Anand Chaturvedi filed a private complaint in the Court of JMFC (Fast Track Court), Bhopal alleging that he had advance a loan in the sum of Rs. 19 lacs to the respondent/accused on 31.03.2010. The amount was withdrawn by him from his account in Punjab National Bank. The loan was to be repaid in July, 2010. The respondent accused gave him a cheque in the sum of Rs. 19 lacs drawn on Oriental Bank of Commerce, Arera Colony Branch, Bhopal, payable on 30.07.2010. He presented the cheque in the bank for encashment but it was dis-honoured for want of funds. E




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top