SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 308

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BENCH
S. C. Sharma, Rajeev Kumar Dubey, JJ.
M/s. Idea Cellular Ltd., Indore & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Asstt. Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Ltu, Indore And Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 7631 of 2014, 3767 of 2015, 363, 2320 of 2016
Decided on : 03-01-2017

The central legal point established in the judgment is that SIM replacement charges and lease line revenue are considered services and not subject to VAT under the M.P. VAT Act, 2002.

Headnote:

SIM Replacement Charges - Constitutional Law - M.P. VAT Act, 2002 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the M.P. VAT Act, 2002, particularly Section 2(u) and 2(v), and their application to SIM replacement charges and lease line revenue. The court also referred to the Finance Act of 1994 and its provisions for service tax on telecommunication services. The judgment highlighted the interpretation of the law in relation to the imposition of VAT on SIM replacement charges and lease line revenue, emphasizing that these charges are considered services and not subject to VAT.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, challenged the imposition of VAT on SIM replacement charges and lease line revenue by the State Government. The petitioner argued that these charges are services and should not be subject to VAT. The respondents contended that the charges fell within the purview of the VAT Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that SIM cards and replacement charges are considered part of the services provided by the company and are not subject to VAT. The court also held that lease line charges are service charges and do not represent a sale, therefore not liable for VAT.

Issues: The main issue was whether the imposition of VAT on SIM replacement charges and lease line revenue was valid under the M.P. VAT Act, 2002.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on various judgments, including those of the Supreme Court, to establish that SIM cards and replacement charges are part of the services provided and not subject to VAT. The court also emphasized that lease line charges are service charges and do not represent a sale, therefore not liable for VAT.

Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned order and notice related to the imposition of VAT on SIM replacement charges and lease line revenue, and allowed the writ petition.

ORDER :

S. C. Sharma, J.

1. Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, the writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of Writ Petition No. 7631/2014 are narrated hereunder.

2. The petitioner before this Court, a Company registered under the Companies Act, has filed this present Writ Petition being aggrieved by the final assessment order dated 31/7/2014 read with demand notice dated 31/7/2014 under Form 28 (Rule 40) of the M.P. VAT Act, 2002. It has been stated in the Writ Petition that the petitioner Company has been granted a Unified Access Services Licences (hereinafter referred to as, ‘the UASL’) by the Central Government for providing telecom services, inter-alia, for the Telecom Circle which is contiguous with the State of Madhya Pradesh and State of Chattisgarh. The petitioner Company provides various kinds of services ie., Cellular, Fixed Line and Broadband services which includes roaming facilities, STD and ISD and other various value added services to its subscribers. The petitioner is rendering a service.

3. It has been further stated that the Central Government by Finance Act of 1994 has imposed service tax on the said services of the petitioner and they are assessed to said tax w.e.f. 14/05/2004.

4. The petitioner Company is aggrieved by the action of the respondent - State in levying tax on the services provided by the petitioner Company. The contention of the petitioner is that the respondents have no authority under the Constitution of India to levy service tax on the services rendered by the petitioner and the same cannot be recovered under the provisions of the M.P. VAT Act, 2002. It has been further stated by the petitioner Company that levy of service tax on the service rendered by providing SIM Replacement Charges and the Lease Line Revenue and simultaneously levy of VAT by the State of Madhya Pradesh is contrary to the separation of legislative powers envisaged under Article 246 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner Company has placed reliance upon various judgments delivered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India as well as by this Court and their contention is that the case law in respect of overlapping of powers between the State and the Union is well established and there is no scope of overlapping. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the State Government in levying VAT on consideration received for providing logistic charges and warranty claims received by the petitioner Company.

5. The contention of the petitioner is that Central Government by Finance Act of 1994 has imposed “Service tax” on the said service of the petitioners and the petitioners are being assessed to the said tax and the petitioner is paying the requisite tax w.e.f. May 14, 2004.

6. It is further contended on behalf of the petitioner-service provider that the use/utility of the SIM card remains the same in both the prepaid and the postpaid connections. In the case of a pre-paid SIM card, service charge is collected mainly for activating the connection, service tax is paid on this consideration as “telecommunication service” a SIM card is incidental to the rendering of telecommunication service; SIM cards are not sold by the service provider to the subscribers, and are not chargeable to VAT. Similarly, when a new SIM card is issued in case the old one is lost, the process of activation is the same and again the charges remain the charges for reactivation and cannot be treated as a sale price.

7. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a Subscriber Identification Module (SIM) card contains a computer chip with prerecorded instructions. It is a device which helps the service provider to identify the subscriber. It also enables the subscriber to access the service provider’s network by means of electro-magnetic waves. The SIM card is merely a key to enter the service provider’s facility and use their



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top