HEMANT GUPTA, S.K.PALO
Shail Modi – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
1. The present appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Single Judge on 25.11.2016, whereby the writ petition, challenging an order dated 29.12.2012 whereby the appellant was communicated that her resignation submitted on 2.7.2012 stands accepted therefore, her withdrawal of resignation cannot be considered.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that resignation was submitted on 2.7.2012, when the same was given to the Principal of the school. It is thereafter, the appellant sought to withdraw her resignation by communication dated 23.10.2012. The appellant reiterated her request on 17.12.2012 by submitting a request to the Collector, District - Khandwa. It is in pursuance to the said communications, the school informed the appellant on 29.12.2012 that her resignation was accepted soon after it was submitted and her salary was stopped. It is thereafter, the appellant was formally informed about the decision on the resignation on 10.12.2012.
3. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition challenging the action of not permitting the appellant to withdraw her resignation on the ground that unilateral resignation does not require any acceptance. F
Prabha Atri (Dr.) v. State of U.P.
Shrikantha S. M. v. Bharath Earth Movers Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.