ROHIT ARYA
Rajendra Singh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Rohit Arya, J.
1. Petitioner taking exception to the order (Annexure P/1) dated 5/12/2014 passed by the disciplinary Authority-respondent no.4 imposing major penalty of dismissal from service; order dated 22/4/15 (Annexure P/2) passed by the appellate Authority-respondent no.3 substituting the penalty of compulsory retirement for dismissal from service, as well as, to the rejection of mercy appeal by respondent no.2 vide order dated 17/7/15, has filed the instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Facts necessary for disposal of this petition are in narrow compass.
3. Petitioner, while serving as a Head Constable, on 8/5/2014 was assigned the duty of custody of accused Pradeep Rathore with the assistance of other three constables namely Kanti Raj (Constable No. 37), Naresh Singh (Constable No. 166) and Wasim Akhtar (Constable No. 1890). On the aforesaid day, at about 9 am, accused Pradeep Rathore was taken to J.A. Hospital for admission from Central Jail, Gwalior. The accused had undergone surgical operation on 9/5/14 and thereafter was shifted to General Ward. The petitioner and said three constables continued to be in charge of custody of the
G.B. Mahajan v. Jalgaon Municipal Council
Indian Express Newspapers v. Union of India
Nilu v. M.P. State Electricity Board
Punjab National Bank v. Kunj Behari Mishra
Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association v. Union of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.