SUJOY PAUL
Rajeev Lochan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Sujoy Paul, J.
In this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have challenged the suspension orders dated 27-2-2015 (Annexure P/7).
2. Draped in brevity, the relevant facts are that the petitioners are employees of respondent No. 2/M.P. State Mining Corporation Limited (Corporation). The Corporation, by impugned order dated 27-2-2015 placed the petitioners under suspension. In the suspension order it is stated that petitioners demanded bribe for payment of vehicle bill of the complainant. The petitioners were caught red-handed by Special Police Establishment of Lokayukta Organization. A criminal case under section 7 and section 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act is registered against the petitioners on 24-7-2013. The registration number of criminal case is 88/13. It is further stated in the suspension order that challan has already been filed before the Special Court on 18-2-2015. Thus, by invoking Clause-54(1) of M.P. State Mining Corporation Limited (Service and Conduct Rule) (Rules), the petitioners are placed under suspension.
3. Shri Anil Khare, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners criticized this order and contende
Ajay Maken v. Adesh Kumar Gupta
Board of Mining Examination v. Ramjee
Grasim Industries Ltd. v. Collector of Customs
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs v. Tarak Nath Ghosh
Principal Secretary, Home Dept. v. Bimal Kumar Mohanty
RBI v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.