RAJENDRA MENON, ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA
Birla Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Labour Commissioner – Respondent
This judgment shall also finally dispose of the pending Writ Petition No. 4804/2015.
2. In this appeal under section 2(1) of the MP Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, exception is sought to an interlocutory order dated 8-3-2016 passed by the writ Court in W.P. No. 4804/2015, whereby a stay granted by the learned writ Court on 29-4-2015 was vacated.
3. Facts in nutshell, go to show that with regard to certain industrial dispute raised pertaining to petitioner/appellant’s establishment, the appropriate Government exercised its jurisdiction and made a reference of the dispute to the Labour Court, Satna vide order dated 9-3-2012, and thereafter amended the same on 19-11-2012. The dispute referred for adjudication initially was as to whether termination of service of Shri Govind Pathak and 36 other employees, in all 37 employees as per list enclosed, is legal or not?
4. Subsequently the reference order was amended and the number of employees, whose cases were referred for adjudication, was increased from 37 to 345. Accordingly, as per appellant’s contention, as the dispute pertains to action taken against 345 employees, therefore, in accordance to the
Management of Express Newspapers (P) Limited, Madras v. The Workers
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.