SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 1030

S.C.SHARMA
Achyut Bhoraskar – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organisation – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

S.C. Sharma, J.

1. Parties through their counsel.

2. The petitioner before this Court, who is a retired employee of Indore Development Authority has filed this present petition for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the employer to hold that the petitioner is entitled for enhancement of pension keeping in view the letter dated 22.11.2006 (Annexure P-4), as the employer has deducted less than 12% from his salary towards contribution payable under the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. The contention of the learned counsel is that under the Scheme, 12% amount of the salary has to be deducted by the employer and contribution to the extent of 12% has to be made by the employer towards the employees fund. His contention is that out of the 12%, only 8.33% has been deposited in the pension fund and 3.67% has been deposited in the provident fund and the employer has deducted 8.33% and, therefore, the pension being granted to the petitioner is less than his entitlement.

3. The aforesaid controversy has been decided by this Court in the case of Devendra Kumar Sharma & Others v. Sant Ravidas Madhya Pradesh Hastshilp Evam Hathkargha Vikas Nigam Ltd. & Others, (W.



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top