SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 98

ANAND PATHAK
Shiv Pratap Singh Tomar – Appellant
Versus
Seema Tomar – Respondent


Advocates:
Nirendra Singh Tomar for petitioner; Ram Krishna Soni for respondents.

ORDER

1. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 6.12.2017 and order dated 11.12.2017 passed in Civil Suit No. 60A/2013 passed by III Civil Judge Class-II Gwalior whereby application preferred at the instance of petitioner (defendant No. 1-b) under section 151 of CPC has been rejected.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that plaintiff/ respondent No. 1 herein has initially instituted a civil suit against defendants for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of suit house. During pendency of the suit defendant No. 1-Umed Singh died and his LRs including present petitioner were brought on record and the suit is still pending. Defendant No. 3 filed written statement on his behalf as well as on behalf of defendants No. 1 and 2 and made averments that original defendant No. 1-Umed Singh has executed a will dated 2.4.2006 in favour of defendant No. 3-Pratap Singh and on the basis of said will he became owner of the suit property. He further averred that being the owner of the suit property, he sold the suit property to one Manish Sharma vide registered sale deed dated 31.3.2012.

3. Defen




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top