HEMANT GUPTA, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Gyan Prakash Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.
The Writ Petition No.17245/2016 filed by the petitioner, Gyan Prakash Patel is in the form of a public interest litigation whereas other writ petitions have been preferred either by the ex office bearers of the Gram Panchayats or by the residents of the Gram Panchayats.
2. For the sake of clarity and convenience the facts adumbrated in the W.P. No.17245/2016 are taken up for adjudication of the lis in question. The challenge in the present petition is to the Notification, dated 26th September, 2016, issued by the State Government, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 5(1)(b) of the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’]. By the impugned Notification, Nagar Parishad Manpur (Municipal Council, Manpur) has been notified to be constituted, by including the area of Gram Panchayats, Manpur, Sigudi, Semra and Govarde. The villages of these Gram Panchayats have been notified in the impugned Notification. Villages-Manpur, Kathar and Barbaspur of the Gram Panchayat Manpur and Village, Sigudi of Gram Panchayat Sigudi; and villages of Semra and Goverde have been notified to be merged in the area of newly constituted Nagar Paris
State of Maharashtra and another vs. Jalgaon Municipality
Rajdhar Singh vs. State of M.P. and another
Sunderjas Kanyalal Bhathija vs. Collector, Thane
State of Punjab vs. Tehal Singh
Prag Ice and Oil Mills v. Union of India
Ramesh Chandra Kachardas Porwal v. State of Maharashtra
Union of India and another v. Cynamide India Ltd. And another
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Barnard v. National Dock Labour Board, (1953) 2 QB 18
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
PTC India Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.