Back
S.K.GANGELE, ANJULI PALO
Sevaklal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
S.K. GANGELE, J.
1. Appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 18.04.2007 passed in Sessions Trial No.205/2006. The trial Court held the appellant guilty for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and awarded sentence of life imprisonment alongwith fine of Rs.1000/-.
2. Prosecution case in brief is that relationship between the deceased and the appellant was not cordial. The appellant used to quarrel with the deceased and used to beat her. On the date of incident, at around 11 O'clock in the night, the deceased, who was the wife of the appellant, was sleeping in the house. The appellant came there. He abused the deceased. Thereafter, he had taken the deceased at the corner of the room and sprinkled kerosene on her and ablaze her. After hearing cry, other family members came on the spot. The deceased was taken to the Police Station Shahgarh. She lodged report on 10.08.2006. Thereafter, she was sent to the government hospital. Her dying declaration was recorded. Deceased died after seven days of the incident. Police conducted investigation and filed charge-sheet against the appellant. The appellant abjured the guilt and pleaded
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
