G.S.AHLUWALIA
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
This application under Section 482 of CrPC has been filed for quashing the proceedings in Sessions Trial No. 59/2017 pending in the Court of Second Additional Sessions Judge, Morena for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC.
2. It is submitted by the counsel for the applicants that the parties have compromised the matter and, therefore, they had filed an application under Section 320 of CrPC, which has been rejected by order dated 21/02/2018. It is submitted that in the light of the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in the cases of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466, the proceeding can be quashed on the basis of compromise.
3. If the FIR which has been lodged against the present applicants is considered, then it is clear that the applicants are the employees of the Bank and it is alleged that on the basis of forged documents, they had sanctioned loan of Rs.60,000/- in favour of co-accused persons. It is well known that the Bank, sanction the loan only after duly verifying the documents. Thus, it cannot be said that the documents which were ma
C.B.I vs. Jagjit Singh reported in (2013) 10 SCC 686
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303
Gopakumar B. Nair vs. C.B.I & Anr
Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466
Ramesh Kamath and Others vs. Mohana Kurup and Others
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi (2014) 15 SCC 29
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.