SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 243

SUJOY PAUL
Northern Coalfields Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Saluja Construction Co. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Grishma Jain
For the Respondent: N.S. Ruprah

JUDGMENT :

This appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 (Arbitration Act) is directed against the order dated 27.09.2009, passed in Civil Suit No. 29-B/2002, passed by 1st Additional Judge to the Court of 1st Upper District Judge, Sidhi.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the respondent was awarded contract for construction of 100 ‘B Type Quarters’ at Bina and an agreement in this regard was entered into between the parties on 11.01.1986. The schedule date for completion of work was 11.03.1987. On 01.10.1992 the Chief Engineer ordered to stop payment and directed that all payments to be kept in abeyance. The respondent issued a notice under Clause 9 of the Agreement (Terms and Conditions) to appoint an arbitrator in respect of Bina Project only by showing the outstanding amount as Rs.2,23,215/-. This amount was shown as outstanding since 13.03.1988. The notice was issued on 08.12.1992. The appellant by reply dated 15.12.1992 rejected the claim of the respondent. The respondent raised a bill of Rs.2,35,215/- and then filed an application un

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top