SUJOY PAUL
Northern Coalfields Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Saluja Construction Co. – Respondent
This appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 (Arbitration Act) is directed against the order dated 27.09.2009, passed in Civil Suit No. 29-B/2002, passed by 1st Additional Judge to the Court of 1st Upper District Judge, Sidhi.
2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the respondent was awarded contract for construction of 100 ‘B Type Quarters’ at Bina and an agreement in this regard was entered into between the parties on 11.01.1986. The schedule date for completion of work was 11.03.1987. On 01.10.1992 the Chief Engineer ordered to stop payment and directed that all payments to be kept in abeyance. The respondent issued a notice under Clause 9 of the Agreement (Terms and Conditions) to appoint an arbitrator in respect of Bina Project only by showing the outstanding amount as Rs.2,23,215/-. This amount was shown as outstanding since 13.03.1988. The notice was issued on 08.12.1992. The appellant by reply dated 15.12.1992 rejected the claim of the respondent. The respondent raised a bill of Rs.2,35,215/- and then filed an application un
Binod Bihari vs. Union of India
Bharat Cooking Coal vs. Annapurna
Bhagwati Oxygen vs. Hindustan Copper
Dhenkanal Minor Irrigation Division vs. N.C. Budharaj
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. vs. C. Rajeshwar Rao
Hari Krishna Wattel vs. Vaikunth Nath Pandya & Anr.
Inder Sain Mittal vs. Housing Board)
Jagmittal vs. Director, Health Services
MSK Projects India (JV) Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan
Maharashtra State Electricity Board vs. Sterilite Industries
Nirod Baren Benerjee vs. Dy. Commissioner of Hazaribagh
Oil & Natural Gas Commission vs. M.C. Clelland Engineers
State of Rajasthan vs. Nav Bharat
Sail vs. Gupta Brothers Steel Bulbs Ltd.
Sathyanarayan Brothers (P) Ltd. vs. T.N. Water Supply & Drainage Board
TN Electricity Board vs. Bridge Tunnal
T.P. George vs. State of Kerala
Union of India vs. Ambika Construction
Union of India vs. Manager, M/s. Jain
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.