S.C.SHARMA
Hakka – Appellant
Versus
Pappu – Respondent
S.C. Sharma, J.
The present appeal (MA No. 1555/2010) has been preferred by the claimant being aggrieved by the Award dated 29/1/2010, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jhabua in Claim Case No. 10 2008 (Hakka s/o Narsingh v. Pappu and 2 others).
2. The other cases arising out of the same accident which took place on 11/11/2007, are also being disposed of by this common order.
3. The undisputed facts of the accident are that a motor vehicle (Jeep) carrying certain persons, bearing Registration No. MP10 A 1245 was going from Hat Bazar, at Jhabua to their respective place of residence and the Jeep met with an accident on account of rash and negligent driving of the Driver. About 7 persons sitting in the Jeep sustained injuries and 7 claim cases were preferred by the injured persons. The claims Tribunal has passed 7 awards by passing a common order dated 29/1/2010 and in all 7 cases compensation has been granted for injuries suffered by the passengers. The award also reflects that there was a breach of the Insurance Policy and the statements recorded during trial also reflects that the Jeep was being used as a transport vehicle by the Driver and the Owner and therefo
Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North
M/s. Gannon Dunkerle and Co. and others Vs. State of Rajasthan and others
The Bengal Immunity Company Limited Vs. The State of Bihar and others
Union of India and another Vs. Reghubir Singh Dead by L.Rs. etc.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.