J.K.MAHESHWARI
Vineeta Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
1. These revisions have been filed under section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as ‘JJ Act’) challenging the orders dated 21.12.2016 and 19.12.2016 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chhindwara returning the application filed by the Child Care Institution (for brevity ‘’CCI’’) and Special Adoption Agency (for brevity ‘’SAA’’) for not passing any order for adoption. The said applications were rejected by the orders impugned, however, these revision have been preferred.
2. During the course of the hearing, it was argued that not only the functioning of the Court, to exercise the jurisdiction in adoption case by the Court concerned is required to be explained which may ensure early disposal of the adoption cases, but simultaneously, the functioning of the Child Welfare Committee (for brevity ‘’CWC’’), State Adoption Resource Agency (for brevity ‘’SARA’’), Special Adoption Agency–Child Care Institution (for brevity ‘’SAA-CCI’’) linkage as referred in the letter of the Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India dated 29.9.2017 (for brevity ‘’MW and CD’’) are also the issues of consideratio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.