Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
H.G. Mishra, J.
Mohan Singh - Petitioner
Vs.
Shrikrishandas - Respondent
C. Revn. No. 201 of 1978 (G)
Decided On : 08-03-1978
The crucial point for determination is whether the procedure applicable to the trial of the suits is applicable to the questions to be determined in execution also. Section 141 does not apply to execution proceedings. Therefore it is not obligatory for the execution Court to frame issues in the instant case. Basaratullah Meyan and others v. Reazuddin Meyan and others, AIR 1926 Cal. 773, Dakku Bheshayya v. Katugadda Ramakrishaniyya and others, AIR 172 SC 1886, Shital Prasad v. Dhankunar and others, AIR 1974 All. 175 relied on. Revision dismissed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
