SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(MP) 841

B.R.DUBE
Gotaram – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : K.P. Gupta.
For the Respondent: Bapat Panel.

Short Note :

1. The applicant Gotaram has filed, this revision against his conviction under sections 457 and 380 IPC and sentence of 10 months R.I. on each count recorded by the trial Court and confirmed in Cr. Appeal No. 126 of 1976 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Barwani.

2. It is not disputed that theft of certain utensils was committed from the Forest Rest House. Khadkiya, after housebreaking by night. The FIR was lodged by the Range Assistant Govindsingh (PW-12) on 8.3.1970. The applicant on being arrested gave information under Section 27 of the Evidence Act vide Ex.P-1 leading to the recovery of one spoon, one glass and one Katori from the possession of co-accused Kailash with whom these articles were kept by the applicant. These articles have been identified as having been stolen from the Forest Rest House.

3. The question for consideration is whether the applicant was rightly convicted for the offence under section 457 and 380 IPC. There is no direct evidence against the applicant to prove that he committed the theft after housebreaking by night. In all 64 utensils were stolen from the Rest House out of which only 3 articles were recovered from the applicant after a per


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top