SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(MP) 917

S.R.VYAS
Virendrakumar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Short Note :

1. A complaint under section 41 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act was filed against the applicants in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Jhabua which was registered as Criminal Case No. 353 of 1976. In this case charges under sections 41 and 63 of the Indian Forest Act were framed and the case was fixed for evidence on the 12th January 1977. On that date an application was made on behalf of the prosecution for charges being framed under sections 468 and 484 of the Indian Penal Code also in addition to the charges referred to above. This application was rejected by the learned trial Magistrate. Against the order rejecting this application, a revision application was filed before the Sessions judge and the learned Addl Sessions Judge, Jhabua who heard this application, set aside the order and directed the learned trial Magistrate to from the charges under the Indian Penal Code as prayed by the prosecution. It is this order which is challenged in this revision application.

Held: It is evident from the impugned order as also from the facts mentioned above that the prosecution desired the learned trial Magistrate also to frame charges under sections 468 and 484 of the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top