A.M.KHANWILKAR, K.K.TRIVEDI
Nihal Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
K.K. Trivedi, J.
This judgment will govern the disposal of all the aforesaid writ petitions. The hearing of the bunch of these writ petitions was done as common questions of law have been raised in all petitions, calling in question the Constitutional validity of the amendment made in section 13 of the M.P. Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Taxation Act' for brevity). However, for the convenience, the facts are taken from Writ Petition No. 1430/2014 (Nihal Ahmed vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others). The petitioner, transporter, has called in question initially the M.P. Ordinance dated 5-10-2009, by which amendment in the Taxation Act was made. Since the Ordinance was made an Act thereafter on 22-12-2009, by way of amending the reliefs, the said amending Act is called in question now. The Constitutional validity of the provisions of amended Act have been called in question, on the ground that the same runs contrary to the provisions of section 192-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'MV Act' for brevity). To bring home the challenge, it is contended that the Apex Court in the case of M.P.A.I.T. Permit Owners
Hardev Motor Transport Vs. State of M.P. and Others
State of U.P. and Others Vs. Sukhpal Singh Bal etc. etc.
M.P.A.I.T. Permit Owners Assn. and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.