SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 994

SANJAY YADAV
Mandu – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Patel.
For the Respondents:Ashish Anand Bernard, Govt. Advocate, Advocates.

ORDER :

SANJAY YADAV, J.

1. Heard. Order dated 8-2-2006 passed by Additional Commissioner is being assailed vide this petition; whereby while setting aside the order passed on 28-1-2002 by Collector, Mandla, the sale of land bearing Khasra No. 14 area 0.68 hectare, Khasra No. 1 area 1.23 hectare, Khasra No. 18 area 1.41 hectare, Khasra No. 162 area 0.60 hectare and Khasra No. 3 area 1.15 hectare, Patwari Halka No. 32, Village Khupsar by petitioners in favour of respondent No. 3 has been upheld.

2. Collector on the finding that the land in question being given on lease to respective petitioners in the year 1975-76, its transfer without seeking prior permission as contemplated under Section 165(7-b) of M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 was void and, therefore, the sale was set aside.

3. Reversing the order, Additional Commissioner found that the lease being granted in years 1975-76 and the transfer being effected in the year 1990, was not hit by Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 1992.

4. Amendment Act, 1992 inserted following sub-section (3) under Section 158:--

"3. Every person--

(i) who is holding land in Bhoomiswami right by virtue of a lease granted to him by the State Govern















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top