HEMANT GUPTA, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Roop Narayan Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J.
Taking exception to the order dated 5-2-2009 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 8935/2008(S) in this intra-Court appeal preferred under section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, assail is to the decision of the respondents denying the appointment to the petitioner-appellant on the post of constable, on the ground of verification of antecedents and character of the appellant.
2. The factual expose adumbrated in a nutshell that the petitioner-appellant was a candidate, who submitted his candidature for appointment on the post of constable on being found eligible and successful in the selection process. His name was empanelled for appointment and the order dated 28-5-2007 (Annexure-P/2) was issued asking the petitioner to appear and participate in the further process of submitting the form and other credentials for appointment. It is submitted that the appellant appeared and submitted his declaration and verification form, vide Annexure-P/3 and in column No. 12 he had stated that he was arrested in respect of the offence punishable under sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code (for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.