SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 1121

VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Samudri Bai – Appellant
Versus
Mohit Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R.P. Khare
For the Respondent: R.K. Kesharwani

ORDER :

In the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question the legality and validity of the order dated 16-3-2013 passed by the 3rd Civil Judge Class-I, Sagar in unregistered Civil Suit No./2013.

2. That the petitioner filed a suit seeking a decree for declaration that the petitioners are the owners in possession of the house situated on khasra No. 201/2 and 222/2, Makronia, District Sagar and the sale deed executed by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of the respondent No. 3 is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs. He also sought a decree for injunction restraining the respondent No. 3 from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff/petitioners.

3. The trial Court by the impugned order directed the plaintiffs to value the suit for injunction as valued for the purpose of declaration and pay ad valorem Court fee on such valuation. Other part of the valuation of the suit and payment of the Court fee of the petitioners/plaintiffs was found to be in accordance with law.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that part of the order whereby the petitioners have been directed to value the suit for in
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top