SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 992

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BENCH
S.C. SHARMA, J.
STATE OF M.P. - Appellant
Versus
HIRUBAI - Respondent
Writ Petition No.3586, 4310, 4311, 4316, 4380, 4419, 4499, 4502, 4847, 4856, 4858, 4935, 6365, 6428, 6488 of 2014
Decided on : 10-01-2017

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definitions of 'oustee' and 'family' under the NWDT Award and State Rehabilitation Policy, emphasizing the entitlement of each joint holder to rehabilitation benefits.

Headnote:

NWDT Award - Rehabilitation and Resettlement - Clause XI(1), Clause XI(IV)(7), State Rehabilitation Policy - Summary of Acts and Sections

Fact of the Case:

The State of Madhya Pradesh filed a petition aggrieved by an order awarding Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) benefits to a major married daughter. The petitioner argued that the daughter did not fall under the definition of an oustee as she was not displaced due to the project, contrary to NWDT award and State Rehabilitation Policy.

Finding of the Court:

The court analyzed the definitions of 'oustee' and 'family' under the NWDT Award and State Rehabilitation Policy, emphasizing that the major son and minor children would be treated as separate families. The court also referred to previous Supreme Court judgments to interpret the legal position and concluded that the major son without rights in the acquired land is not entitled to separate allotment of land. The court upheld the order of the Grievance Redressal Authority, dismissing the writ petitions filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Issues: Interpretation of 'oustee' and 'family' definitions, entitlement of major son and minor children to separate allotment of land, and the application of NWDT Award and State Rehabilitation Policy.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the major son without rights in the acquired land is not entitled to separate allotment of land, and the minor children and wife also do not stand on a better footing. The court also highlighted the inclusive nature of the definition of 'family' and the entitlement of each joint holder to rehabilitation benefits.

Final Decision: The court upheld the order of the Grievance Redressal Authority, dismissing the writ petitions filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh.

ORDER :

S.C. SHARMA, J.

1. Parties through their counsel.

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, the writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of Writ Petition No.3586/2014 are narrated hereunder.

2. The petitioner No.1 before this Court State of Madhya Pradesh and one another have filed this present petition being aggrieved by order dated 16/03/2012 passed by President, Grievance Redressal Authority, Sardar Sarovar Project whereby the benefits of Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) have been awarded to Khatedars/land holders including the major married daughter.

3. The contention of petitioners is that major married daughter does not fall under the definition of an oustee as she has not been displaced due to project and therefore, the impugned order is contrary to the provisions of NWDT award and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy framed by the State Government.

4. The facts of the case reveal that the respondent Hirubai's father namely Keriya was having land admeasuring 1.77 hectares in Village Dehdala and it came under submergence. The name of Hirubai was recorded as Bhumiswami in the land records and thereafter, a notification was issued under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act on 07/09/2001 and an award was passed in the name of Hirubai.

5. Hirubai filed an application before the Grievance Redressal Authority stating that she is a Bhumiswami / Khatedars as her father expired prior to notification dated 07/09/2001 and by virtue of being a tenure holder (Bhumiswami/ Khatedars), she is entitled for two hectares of land. The revenue records were placed before the Grievance Redressal Authority and record of rights (Khasras) reflects that the deceased Keriya was having three sons and daughters and the name of the daughter namely Hirubai finds place in the record of rights (Khasras).

6. Thus, it establishes that prior to issuance of notice under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act on 07/09/2001; Hirubai was recorded in the record of rights (Khasras). The Grievance Redressal Authority, as the name of Hirubai was recorded prior to 07/09/2001 in the record of rights (Khasras) has arrived at a conclusion that she is entitled for two hectares of land, keeping in view the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy.

7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

8. The definitions of "oustee" and "family" given in Clause XI(1) of the NWDT Award as under:-

"Oustee" "An" 'oustee' shall mean any person who since at least one year prior to the date of publication of the notification under section 4 of the Act, has been ordinarily residing or cultivating land or carrying on any trade, occupation, or calling or working for gain in the area likely to be submerged permanently or temporarily."

I(3) "Family" "(i) A family shall include husband, wife and minor children and other persons dependent on the head of the family, e.g., widowed mother.

(ii) Every major son will be treated as a separate family."

9. The relevant part of Clause XI(IV)(7) is as follows:-

"IV(7) Allotment of Agricultural lands: Every displaced family from whom more than 25% of its landholding is acquired shall be entitled to and be allotted irrigable land to the extent of land acquired from it subject to a minimum of 2 hectares (five acres) per family."

10. In the Rehabilitation Policy of the State also the definitions of "displaced person" and of "family" and the Clause providing for allotment of agricultural land are as under:-

**foLFkkfir O;fDr%&

v- dksbZ O;fDr tks ml {ks= ftldh LFkkbZ ;k vLFkkbZ :i ls ifj;kstuk ds dkj.k tyexz gksus dh laHkkou gS] esa Hkw&vtZu vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 4 ds v/khu vf/klwpuk izdk'ku dh rkjh[k ls de ls de ,d o"kZ iwoZ ls lk/kkj.kr;k jgrk jgk gS ;k dksbZ O;kikj] /kU/kk vkthfodk ds fy;s dk;Z djrk jgk gS ;k Hkwfe ij dk;Z djrk jgk gSA

1- 1-1 ¼c½ foLFkkfir ifjokj

1- mi;qZDr ifjHkkf"kr foLFkkfir O;fDr;ksa ls cuk ifjokj ftlesa ifr] iRuh























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top