SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 1058

S.K.AWASTHI
DURGESH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA KANTE – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri P.C. Chandil, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent: Shri B.B. Shukla, Learned Counsel

ORDER :

S.K. AWASTHI, J.

1. The instant civil revision has been preferred to challenge the order dated 14.07.2016 passed in Civil Suit No. 94A/2016 by the Court of XIVth Civil Judge Class II, Gwalior by which the application under Order 11 Rule 21 of the Civil Procedure Code (for brevity 'CPC') filed by the present applicants/defendants has been dismissed.

2. The facts necessary for adjudication of the present case are that, the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for eviction, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profit with respect to the suit property, more particularly described in para 1 of the plaint (Annexure P-2). The present respondent/plaintiff filed a list of documents which are relied upon by him in order to establish his case. The trial Court invited defendants to file their written statement. However, the defendants/applicants moved an application under Order 11 Rules 12, 14 read with section 151 of CPC, on the ground that the list of documents indicated in the table termed as "list of reliance' refers to several documents, however, their copies have not been supplied to the defendants. Further, it has not been indicated whether the respondent/plaintiff is in possession o


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top