ANAND PATHAK
Vinod Devi – Appellant
Versus
Saroj Devi Gupta – Respondent
1. The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioners/defendants against the order dated 07/02/2018 passed by 7th Additional District Judge, District-Morena in Appeal No.09-A/14 preferred at the instance of petitioners/defendants in which a direction has been given to the petitioners/appellants to submit Hindi translated copy of appeal memo.
2. Precisely stated facts of the case for adjudication are that a suit was filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for eviction and recovery of rent against the present petitioners/defendants. It appears that the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 31/01/2014, decreed the suit filed by the plaintiffs under Section 12(1)(b) and 12 (1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the trial Court, appeal under Section 96 of CPC was preferred before the first appellate Court. It further appears that appeal was preferred in English language. Matter was pending for final arguments. Meanwhile, counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs prayed for translated copy of appeal memo in Hindi to facilitate the final arguments. Appellate Court direct
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.