SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.A.NAQVI
PRASANNA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
KEDARLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aniket Naik, for the Appellant;

JUDGMENT

S.A. Naqvi, J.

Appellant/defendant has preferred this appeal aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 25-1-1997 passed by Additional District Judge, Sheopurkalan in civil suit No. 9-A/89 whereby the suit of the respondents/ plaintiffs for redemption has been decreed.

The facts of the case in brief are that plaintiffs and defendants No. 7 to 9 mortgaged their house situated at Shivpuri road Town, Sheopur for a loan of Rs. 20,000/- vide registered deed dated 1-1-1974. The house comprises of four shops and a hall. Manikchand has died. Respondents No. 8 to 16 are the legal representatives of Manikchand. The main conditions of the mortgage deed were that the house is mortgaged for a period of four years. The house is to be redeemed in this period after the payment of the principle amount and the interest i.e. at the rate of interest 1.5 paisa per month which amounts to Rs. 300/- per month. The rent which is to be fetched by the property shall be adjusted in the interest. Remaining interest will be payable per month. The rent of the hall which is Rs. 110/- shall be adjusted towards interest. The rent accruable from the four shops will be adjusted towards interest. Meelabchand is a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top