SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ABHAY M.NAIK
BADSHAH ALIAS TAJ MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N. Fakhruddin, for the Appellant; S.S. Bisen, Government Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Abhay M. Naik, J.

This petition has been preferred against the revocation of licence of firearm vide Annexures P/1 and P/2.

Short facts leading to the petition are that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Narsinghpur. He is engaged in the business of stone crusher which is situated at a distance of about 35 Kms. from Narsinghpur which is near to the forest area. Petitioner on account of safety measure obtained Gun Licence No. 213/94. The Superintendent of Police, Narsinghpur wrote to the licensing authority that Criminal Cases Nos. 25/2000 and 517/2000 were pending against the petitioner and therefore, his licence may be suspended. A show cause notice u/s 17(3)(b) of the Arms Act, 1959 for suspension of licence was issued to the petitioner, which was duly replied. Learned licensing authority vide his order dated 8-1-2001 revoked the licence of the petitioner and directed the officer-in-charge of Police Station, Narsinghpur to confiscate the 315 NP Bore Rifle with 10 live bullets. Order dated 8-1-2001 is on record as Annexure P/2 which was challenged before the Commissioner, Jabalpur in Appeal No. 13-121/2000-2001. Against the dismissal of appeal, W.P. No. 2097/2002 was pre

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top