V.K.AGRAWAL
SHEETAL SAHKARI GRIH NIRMAN SANSTHAN (MARYADIT) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
V.K. Agrawal, J.
By the impugned order dated 12-7-2000, an application under Order 1, Rule 10 of CPC (Annexure P/2) filed by the present respondent No. 3 Danish Grih Nirman Sahkari Samiti, has been allowed and the said society, has been permitted to be impleaded as Defendant No. 3.
Facts leading to the present revision stated in brief are that the plaintiffs/petitioners filed a suit praying for injunction against the defendants/respondent No. 1 State of Madhya Pradesh and respondent No. 2 Municipal Corporation, Bhopal, restraining them from demolishing, removing or interfering with the construction over the suit land bearing Khasra No. 28/1/2, situate at Idgah Hills, Bhopal. It was alleged that the suit land was purchased by the plaintiff/petitioner from one Iqbal khan by registered sale-deeds executed in the year 1992. They had thereafter made construction thereon after obtaining necessary permission from the Directorate of Town and Country Planning and also from the respondent No. 2 Municipal Corporation, Bhopal. It was further alleged that subsequently the Directorate of Town and Country Planning issued a memo dated 15-6-1999 purporting to cancel the building permission grant
Ramesh Hirachand Kundanmal Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Others
Deputy Commr., Hardoi, in charge Court of Wards, Bharawan Estate Vs. Rama Krishna Narain and Others
Razia Begum Vs. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.