BHAWANI SINGH, S.L.JAIN
M. P. STATE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ARUNA PYASI – Respondent
Bhawani Singh, C.J.
This L.P.A. arises out of the order of learned Single Judge passed on 17-9-2002, directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for compassionate appointment within two months from the date of order and get requisite forms filled up by her within 15 days and make payment of retiral dues within two months, failure to entail payment of interest at the rate of 12% per annum, from the date of order and retiral dues and in case the same is not paid within two months, interest recoverable from the salary of the person of the Federation responsible for clearing the dues.
Satish Kumar Pyasi was the husband of Smt. Aruna Pyasi. He was permanent employee of the appellant working as Field Assistant in the District of Rajgarh (Byavra). He is missing since 7-2-1992. Accordingly, Smt. Aruna Pyasi (petitioner) submitted an application for compassionate appointment and retiral dues of her husband. However, the same was rejected. Precisely, case of the petitioner is that she is entitled to compassionate appointment as per rules applicable to the employees of the appellant - her husband presumed to have died. Appellant submits that husband of the petitioner
State of H.P. and Another Vs. Jafli Devi (Smt.)
Union of India (UOI) Vs. Joginder Sharma
Appula Vadhyar Narayana Vadhyar Vs. Venkateswara Vadhyar and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.