SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.K.MAHESHWARI
ARCHANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.K. Patwari and L.C. Patne, for the Appellant; A.S. Gokhale, Government Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

J.K. Maheshwari, J.

This order shall also govern the disposal of following writ petitions:

(2) W.P. No. 3874/2006 (S) Sarda Rawat and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors. (3) W.P. No. 4405/2006 (S) Meer Bhuria and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors. (4) W.P. No. 4547/2006 (S) Premlata and Ors. v. State of M.P. and Ors. (5) W.P. No. 4752/2006 (S) Shayani Sissodiya v. State of M.P. and Ors. (6) W.P. No. 4753/2006 (S) Sunita v. State of M.P. and Ors. (7) W.P. No. 4754/2006 (S) Asha v. State of M.P. and Ors. (8) W.P. No. 4755/2006 (S) Ku: Ranubala v. State of M.P. and Ors. (9) W.P. No. 4938/2006 (S) Ku. Sharda v. State of M.P. and Ors.

All these petitions have been filed challenging the orders dated 5-7-2006, 11-7-2006, 27-7-2006, 20-7-2006, 28-7-2006 and 19-7-2006 by which the selection of Petitioners for training of Multi Purpose Family Health Worker (hereinafter referred as 'MPFHW') has been ordered to be cancelled, in view of the instructions issued by the Directorate of Health Services dated 5-7-2006, 20-7-2006 and 24-7-2006.

It is the case of Petitioners that they have passed the High School Certificate Examination after the Education Session 1996-97 from Madhya Pradesh Rajya Open School B























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top