SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SATHAYE
Jeewanlal – Appellant
Versus
Government of Bhopal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R. Punjwani.

ORDER :

1. The petitioners filed an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution for (a) issue of a writ of certiorari, to the Government of Bhopal to quash its order dated 18-4-1952, reinstating non-petitioner 3 and/or the order dated 26-6-1952 and a notification of the same date passed by it, superseding the Municipal Board, Sehore, (b) a writ of prohibition to prevent the Government of Bhopal non-petitioner 1 from taking steps to implement the said notification and the non-petitioners 1 to 3 from giving effect to it as also the order, (c) a writ of prohibition or mandamus directing non-petitioners not to prevent the petitioners from exercising their legal rights as Chairman and Member of the Board by holding meetings etc. including the legal right of selecting a candidate for the post of the Executive Officer from out of the applicants for it and (d) other ancillary orders.

2. In the same petition a prayer for an interim temporary injunction to restrain the non-petitioners 2 and 3 from taking charge from the petitioner 1 and an interim order as stated in Cls. (b) and (c) above, was made. A separate application for issue of such temporary injunction, as stated above, is also file















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top