SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANGHI
Jagannath Shivnarayan – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Commissioner, City Municipality, Indore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.R. Newaskar-for Appellant
Dingankar-for Respondent

JUDGMENT :

1. In Sadar Bazar in the City of Indore, there is a Shiv temple bearing house No. 42. On one side of the temple there is a well, a cattle trough and a kachha otla. On the three Bides of the temple and the otla, on the North, South and the East, there is open land. Agrawal Panchas are the Sewaks of the temple and the appellant plaintiff looks after the management of the temple on behalf of the Panchas. Some time in the year 1946, he started setting up a wire enclosure, thereby appropriating a part of the open land to the temple. The Municipal Commissioner claimed the open Government land to be vested in him under S. 36, Indore Municipal Act, and called upon the plaintiff - Appellant to remove the wire fencing. On 19-10-1946, the appellant instituted a suit in the Court of the Munsif, Indore City, against the Munioipal Commissioner for a declaration that the land enclosed was the property of the temple and for an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the work of erecting the enclosure.

2. The learned Munsif found that the land had been proved to been the possession of the plaintiff for about 25 years and under S. 110, Evidence Act he should be presumed t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top