SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MADHYA BHARAT HIGH COURT, GWALIOR BENCH
DIXIT, A.H. KHAN, JJ.
Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Madhya Bharat – Respondent
Civil Misc. Case No. 9 of 1953
Decided On : 07-05-1954

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Veda Vyasa, Puttulal Dubey.
For the Respondent: K.A. Chitale.

An executive order is not a law and is not enforceable in Court.

Headnote:

CESS - LEVY - VALIDITY - Gwalior Darbar Order dated 27-7-1946 imposing cess on sugar-cane purchased by petitioner-company - Not a law - Executive order - Not published in Gazette - Not enforceable in Court - Levy of cess after 26-1-1950 - Unconstitutional - Violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner-company challenged the validity of the cess levied on it by the State of Madhya Bharat on the purchase of sugar-cane. The cess was imposed by the Gwalior Darbar Order dated 27-7-1946, which was passed before the merger of Gwalior State with Madhya Bharat. The petitioner-company contended that the Darbar Order was not a law but an executive order and, therefore, not enforceable in Court. It also contended that the levy of cess was discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the Darbar Order dated 27-7-1946 was not a law but an executive order. It was not published in the Gazette and was not enforceable in Court. The Court further held that the levy of cess was discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution.

Issues: 1. Whether the Gwalior Darbar Order dated 27-7-1946 was a law or an executive order? 2. Whether the levy of cess was discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the Darbar Order dated 27-7-1946 was not a law but an executive order because: a) It was not published in the Gazette. b) It was not passed by the Legislature. c) It was not in the form in which laws were enacted and promulgated in the former Gwalior State in 1946. d) It was passed in the exercise of the Ruler's administrative powers and not in the exercise of his legislative powers. 2. The Court held that the levy of cess was discriminatory and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution because: a) It was levied only on the petitioner-company and not on other sugar factories in the State. b) The proceeds of the cess were not earmarked for the benefit of the petitioner-company.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and restrained the State of Madhya Bharat from realizing any further cess from the petitioner-company after 26-1-1950.

JUDGMENT :

DIXIT, J.

1. This is an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a writ or a direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the State of Madhya Bharat not to levy any cess on the petitioner Company on the sugar-cane purchased by it and not to realise any cess from the said company, and to refund the amount already recovered as cess. The petition arises in the following circumstances.

2. On 1-5-1940 an agreement was entered into between the Government of the former Gwalior State and Sir Homi Mehta and others for the establishment of a sugar factory in Dabra. In pursuance of the agreement the petitioner-company was floated, sugar factory was established at Dabra and in due course it went into production. On 20-6-1946. His Highness the Maharaja Scindia, the Ruler of the Gwalior State, constituted a committee

"to consider the desirability of imposing a cane cess on the lines of the U.P. or Bihar and to recommend the procedure of fixation of sugar prices within the terms of the agreement subsisting between the Government and the factory."

One Minister and three officials of the State were appointed by name as members of this committee. The committee submitted its report to the Gwalior Darbar on 23-7-1946 together with a "Guzarish" (Submission) from Sardar M.R. Phalke who was a member of the committee and who presided over the deliberation of the committee. Sardar Phalke was at that time also a Revenue Minister in the Government of His Highness the Maharaja Scindia. The Gujarish presented by Sardar Phalke contained the following submissions to the Darbar :

"1. that "following U.P. policy it is essential to levy on the factory a cane cess of one anna per maund on all sugar-cane purchased by the factory."

2. that "the proceeds of the cess will primarily be used for cane development work and the utilization and administration of the fund will be under the Cane Development Board." A recommendation was also made as to how the Board should be constituted.

3. that "sugar prices will be fixed on the recommendation of this Board on the basis unanimously recommended in this report."

3. On this Gujarish His Highness the Maharaja Scindia passed on 27-7-1946 the order "Guzarish sanctioned".

On the basis of this order the Economic Adviser of the Gwalior Government wrote a letter to the petitioner-company which stated inter alia :

"With a view to expand cane area and cane yield in the Harsi commanded area so that the Gwalior Sugar Company Limited be put on a sound and stable basis, the Gwalior Government have decided to impose a cane cess of one anna per maund on all sugar-cane purchased by your factory. The operation of this cess will start from the coming sugar-cane crushing season. The proceeds of the cess have been earmarked for cane development work in Harsf region that will be undertaken by a Cane Development Board constituted for the purpose."

4. In reply the petitioner-company made several unsuccessful representations protesting against the levy of the cess. After the formation of Madhya Bharat the petitioner again made a representation to the Madhya Bharat Government against the levy of the cess. This time also the petitioner company was unsuccessful and was informed that the imposition and recovery of the cess having been imposed in the past under "competent authority of His Highness the Maharaja of Gwalior was valid." Some time after the coming into force of the Constitution of India the company again appealed to the Government for the withdrawal of the cess.

According to the petitioner, on this appeal a meeting of the officers concerned was called by the Adviser to the Government, and that as a result, the Adviser decided to recommend to the Government that the cane purchased by the petitioner company from the Gwalior Agriculture Company should be exempted from cess, and that since the levy of a cess on the petitioner company alone was not equitable, the Industries and Agricultural Departments and the Econ






































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top