SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

CHATURVEDI
Amarji S/o Nagaji Anjana – Appellant
Versus
Joravarsingh Gabbaji – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.R. Newaskar and S.R. Joshi
For the Respondent: S.R. Pandit

JUDGMENT :

Plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit in the Court of Additional Munsiff, Hatod, against the defendant-opponent for a sum of Rs.940/-. The facts of the case which gave rise to this suit are as follows: Plaintiff's father had money dealings with, and had lent money to, Kanhiram, brother of the defendant. On 3-5-1940 the accounts were settled and a balance was struck. Rs.1200/- were found due to the plaintiff's father in Kanhiram's account. Kanhiram agreed to pay Rs.1200/- and it was arranged that the plaintiff's father should take the defendant's field known as 'Khajurwala khet' for a period of 12 years and get his liability discharged by crediting Rs.100/- every year for the enjoyment or occupation.

2. The agreement was reduced to writing and recorded in the account-book of plaintiff's father and is alleged to have been signed by the defendant and his brother Kaniharm. The agreement is in the following form:

"The balance due today is Rs.1200/-. In lieu of this amount I give my field Khajurwala to the plaintiff for a period of 12 years. The Government dues will be paid by the plaintiff. I will have no objection to this. In case debt is not discharged I shall pay interest at the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top