Back
SHEEL NAGU, S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Chhotelal Pachori – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
CONTEXT
1. This intra Court appeal filed under section 2(i) Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 questions the legality and validity of the order passed by writ Court dismissing Writ Petition No. 23123/2017 seeking quashment of the order of State dated 24.6.2017 by which an application for grant of firearm licence (pistol/revolver) was rejected by taking recourse to section14 (1) (b) (i) of the Arms Act, the new Firearm Policy of the State of M.P., and by assigning reason of absence of any threat to life and security of petitioner from any person or group of persons.
SUBMISSIONS
2. Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner primarily submits by relying upon the decision of this Court in Dharampal Ramnarayan Agrawal v. State of M.P. [1998(1) MPLJ 537], that while rejecting an application for firearm licence the least that is required is to assign reasons disclosing mind of the Licencing Authority (LA for brevity) for taking the adverse view for which reliance is placed on the provision of section 14(3) of Arms Act 1959 (Arms Act for brevity) which mandates/obliges the LA (State Government) to record reasons in writing and communicate th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
