SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

U.C.MAHESHWARI
Sadhna Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Chand Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ashish Shroti, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shobhit Aditya, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

U.C. Maheshwari, J.

The applicant accused has preferred this revision u/s 397 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the order dated 17.11.2011 passed by 7th Additional District Judge, Bhopal allowing the revision of the respondent and reversing the order dated 7.7.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate-First Class, Bhopal in Criminal Case No. 18427/2008, instituted by the respondent to prosecute the applicant u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (in short “the Act”), allowing his application filed u/s 45 of Evidence Act to get examine her alleged signature on the cheque in dispute from the hand writing expert and dismissed such application. The facts giving rise to this revision in short are that the applicant herein to pay the consideration had given the impugned cheque to the respondent. The respondent deposited the same with his Banker for collection but was returned to him with the memo of his Banker with endorsement that same has been dishonoured due to insufficient fund, on which after complying the technical provisions of Section 138 and other related provisions of the Act the respondent had filed the impugned complaint against the applicant, in which the cognizance of Sec





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top